District court properly granted summary judgment against employee who claimed employer terminated him to avoid complying with potential administrative wage garnishment order. Employee could not show that any of individuals involved in his termination knew about the potential garnishment. Alleged constructive notice was insufficient to infer unlawful motivation. Sutherland v. CWH Red Bull Distribution Co., Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20330 (9th Cir. Nov. 23, 2015).
Note: We analyze cases to learn rules the courts will follow or disappoint us if they don't. Rules that the courts follow allow us to behave and provide explanations they accept. But competent advocates may limit the rules to the facts of the case where they are discussed, or expand rules by showing that differences in other cases are irrelevant.